{"id":18599,"date":"2016-04-18T10:16:03","date_gmt":"2016-04-18T07:16:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/the-state-fiscal-service-of-ukraine-rejected-the-complaint-of-3s-production-studio\/"},"modified":"2016-04-18T10:16:03","modified_gmt":"2016-04-18T07:16:03","slug":"the-state-fiscal-service-of-ukraine-rejected-the-complaint-of-3s-production-studio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/the-state-fiscal-service-of-ukraine-rejected-the-complaint-of-3s-production-studio\/","title":{"rendered":"The State Fiscal Service of Ukraine rejected the complaint of 3S Production Studio"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On April 13, 2016 the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine informed <strong>Savik Shuster Studio<\/strong><strong> LLC <\/strong>of rejection of the appeal on tax notices-decisions rendered in 2015. We shall remind that on March 30, 2016 a reconsideration of the administrative complaints without final settlement of the case took place in the central office of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine. The lawyer of Savik Shuster, managing partner of the <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">International Legal Center EUCON<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/team\/partners\/yaroslav-romanchuk\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Yaroslav Romanchuk<\/a><\/strong> made an application on postponement of the case review. <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/novy-j-povorot-v-nalogovom-spore-savik-shuster-studiya\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">READ MORE<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The video from Shuster LIVE talk-show on this matter:<\/p>\n<p><iframe src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/YsSx1-CTmw8\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Previous circumstances of the tax dispute &#8211; <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/novy-j-povorot-v-nalogovom-spore-savik-shuster-studiya\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">READ MORE<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/3s.tv\/MAIN\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Savik Shuster Studio<\/a><\/strong> entrusted <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">International Legal Center EUCON<\/a><\/strong> to represent their interests in both administrative and criminal proceedings.<!--more--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On April 13, 2016 the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine informed Savik Shuster Studio LLC of rejection of the appeal on tax notices-decisions rendered in 2015. We shall remind that on March 30, 2016 a reconsideration of the administrative complaints without final settlement of the case took place in the central office of the State [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4922,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[98],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v16.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The State Fiscal Service of Ukraine rejected the complaint of 3S Production Studio - EUCON legal Group<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The State Fiscal Service of Ukraine rejected the complaint of 3S Production Studio - EUCON legal Group\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On April 13, 2016 the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine informed Savik Shuster Studio LLC of rejection of the appeal on tax notices-decisions rendered in 2015. We shall remind that on March 30, 2016 a reconsideration of the administrative complaints without final settlement of the case took place in the central office of the State [:]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"EUCON legal Group\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-04-18T07:16:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/11-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"960\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"540\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/\",\"name\":\"EUCON legal Group\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/11-3.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/11-3.jpg\",\"width\":960,\"height\":540},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"#webpage\",\"url\":null,\"name\":\"The State Fiscal Service of Ukraine rejected the complaint of 3S Production Studio - EUCON legal Group\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-04-18T07:16:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-18T07:16:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/885bb53bf78f77a53b9f988b08ac37e9\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[null]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The State Fiscal Service of Ukraine rejected the complaint of 3S Production Studio\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/885bb53bf78f77a53b9f988b08ac37e9\",\"name\":\"osadchyppua\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05757e1f9a085053643881aaa3c3ee31?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05757e1f9a085053643881aaa3c3ee31?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"osadchyppua\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18599"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18599"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18599\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4922"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}