{"id":18854,"date":"2018-01-29T14:38:34","date_gmt":"2018-01-29T12:38:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/eucon-defended-the-interests-of-linik-pjsc-in-a-dispute-with-the-state-fiscal-service-of-ukraine\/"},"modified":"2018-01-29T14:38:34","modified_gmt":"2018-01-29T12:38:34","slug":"eucon-defended-the-interests-of-linik-pjsc-in-a-dispute-with-the-state-fiscal-service-of-ukraine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/eucon-defended-the-interests-of-linik-pjsc-in-a-dispute-with-the-state-fiscal-service-of-ukraine\/","title":{"rendered":"EUCON defended the interests of LINIK PJSC in a dispute with the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine"},"content":{"rendered":"

EUCON<\/a> won in a 6-years dispute against the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine (with its tax and customs departments) regarding appealing the decisions for a total of UAH 55 million<\/strong> based on the results of a planned inspection of LINIK PJSC, in the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine.<\/p>\n

The dispute related to the use of technological waste during the oil refining process, that is closely connected with the features of the production process of finished oil products.<\/p>\n

Courts of all instances agreed with the legal position of the taxpayer’s lawyers and forensic experts regarding the impossibility of taxing waste in the technological process of oil refining.<\/p>\n

Lawyers of EUCON proved in court that there was a rough arithmetical error in determining tax liabilities amounting to more than UAH 55 million, since the inspection report does not contain calculations and conclusions on that amount.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

EUCON won in a 6-years dispute against the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine (with its tax and customs departments) regarding appealing the decisions for a total of UAH 55 million based on the results of a planned inspection of LINIK PJSC, in the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine. The dispute related to the use of [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11167,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[98],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nEUCON defended the interests of LINIK PJSC in a dispute with the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine - EUCON legal Group<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"EUCON defended the interests of LINIK PJSC in a dispute with the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine - EUCON legal Group\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"EUCON won in a 6-years dispute against the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine (with its tax and customs departments) regarding appealing the decisions for a total of UAH 55 million based on the results of a planned inspection of LINIK PJSC, in the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine. The dispute related to the use of [:]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"EUCON legal Group\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-01-29T12:38:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/img_30671-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"133\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/\",\"name\":\"EUCON legal Group\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"#primaryimage\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/img_30671-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/img_30671-1.jpg\",\"width\":200,\"height\":133},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"#webpage\",\"url\":null,\"name\":\"EUCON defended the interests of LINIK PJSC in a dispute with the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine - EUCON legal Group\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-01-29T12:38:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-29T12:38:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/885bb53bf78f77a53b9f988b08ac37e9\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[null]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"EUCON defended the interests of LINIK PJSC in a dispute with the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/885bb53bf78f77a53b9f988b08ac37e9\",\"name\":\"osadchyppua\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05757e1f9a085053643881aaa3c3ee31?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/05757e1f9a085053643881aaa3c3ee31?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"osadchyppua\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18854"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18854"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18854\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11167"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/euconlaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}